Home - Page 1
Page 2
Page 3


Table of Contents for Page 2

What is the United States government capable of?

More Proof of NASA's Trickery

What Would the Vacuum of Space do to a Rocket or a Space Suit?

Gov't Documents Admit Flat Earth

How NASA Fakes Everything! Warning!

If the Earth Really was a Globe, How Much Would All that Water in the Ocean Weigh?

Is the Moon Simply a Reflection of the Flat Earth

NASA's Fake Images Just Keep Getting Better.

Is the Mars Rover Really on Mars?

Sonoluminescence: Proof of How Our Sun Works?

NASA's First Film from "Space"

Why do We Say the Right Things but Believe the Wrong Things?

Useful Links



Welcome to the World's Premier Flat Earth Web Page!

Page 2

Proving that the Earth is NOT a Globe!

Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. As the owner of this website, I will not be held responsible for the information contained herein. I cannot guarantee the truthfulness or accuracy of any information contained on this website or for any information linked to from this website. Jay McMullan (JayMc.com) will not be liable to anyone in relation to the contents of this website, the contents thereof, the use thereof or otherwise in connection to this website. By using this website you agree to the terms of this disclaimer. If you do not agree with these terms you must not use this website.


Blue Origin Rockets into Outer Space or Did It?

See Jeff Bezos Launch Into Space With Blue Origin Crew

20 July 2021

Today the news reported that Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and his crew launched in their Blue Origin rocket and went into space. Don’t be so quick to believe it! Have you ever noticed how no one ever questions any of this stuff?

What delineates “space?” In the past, scientists believed the earth’s atmosphere and space separated at 100,000 kilometers or 62 miles. They have referred to this imaginary line as the “Kármán line.” To be very honest, scientists truly do not know where the earth’s atmosphere ends and space begins. Click Here to read this article.

After looking at data from a “spaceship” from twenty years ago, some scientists now believe the earth’s atmosphere may extend as far as 400,000 miles above the earth. If the moon truly is 238,856 miles away from the earth and these scientists are correct, that would mean the moon orbits inside the earth’s atmosphere!

The Blue Origin’s apogee, or their maximum altitude today was 351,210 feet above sea level or 107 kilometers (66.5 miles). If the earth’s atmosphere truly is 400,000 miles above sea level, the Blue Origin didn’t even come close to going into space.

“But wait,” you say. “I saw them throwing a ball and Skittles in their space capsule and those things were floating because of the lack of gravity!” Don’t be so sure of that either. How do our astronauts practice for what we have been told is zero gravity? They do it in airplanes, yes, airplanes. They get aboard a specially outfitted jet and the jet climbs to a high altitude. Then the jet dives making the people inside “feel” like they are experiencing zero gravity. They aren’t. This is called parabolic flight. They are just falling but they feel like they are floating because they are confined inside the jet and it tricks their perception. Maybe these civilian astronauts were throwing Skittles inside an airplane that was performing parabolic flight and that is what we were shown? You don’t think they would do something like that? Over the years NASA has shown many films that were proven to be deceptions!

What really happened with Blue Origin is that the rocket blasted up into the sky and as it began to fall back to earth it appeared as though there was zero gravity. The Blue Origin did not go into space and it was not in zero gravity.

Zero-G Flight - Parabolic Flight with the Airbus A300 Of Novespace

What zero gravity really feels like in the “vomit comet”

We’ve been told for at least sixty-five years that astronauts in space experience zero gravity. That is a lie too, if you believe the latest news. Those astronauts are actually experiencing ninety percent of the earth’s gravity while aboard the International Space Station. Why doesn’t the International Space Station fall back to earth? Well, now they say because it is being slung around the earth like if you take a heavy weight on the end of a string and spin it round and round. Instead of the heavy weight falling to the ground, it stays at the end of the string because of the centrifugal force. Are Astronauts Really Weightless?

Now, think about this. If the Blue Origin did really fly to an apogee of 351,210 feet above sea level and once it hit its apogee, it immediately began to fall, making the Skittles appear to be floating inside the space capsule. If you want to get an idea of what “weightlessness” feels like, drive down a hilly road and go fast enough you fly over the hills or go on a rollercoaster. You will get much of the same sensation however only for a small fraction of the time you would in a zero G airplane. So, if Jeff Bezos and his civilian astronauts were truthful about this entire thing, they would admit that they did not actually experience zero G’s or weightlessness! The Blue Origin was simply falling, making the people aboard "feel" like they were weightless. If you listen to the first video I posted above from NBC News, they admit the flight was suborbital which means they were just up in the sky, no big deal!

Another trick that Bezos used in the video we were shown is the use of “fish-eye lenses” on the cameras. There is no way you could see the curvature of the earth as it appears in this video. See my articles “A Word About Camera Lenses” and “More on Camera Lenses” by clicking here.

"How it felt? Oh my God!": Jeff Bezos and Blue Origin crew speak after spaceflight

Notice at about 14:22 in the video above, Wally Funk says, "I thought we were going to see the world but we weren't quite high enough." In order to see the curvature of the earth with the human eye like a fish-eye lens makes it appear, you would have to be many times higher than this "spacecraft" could ever take you! Actually, something like 9,000 miles away from the earth.

So, if you believe all the latest news, the International Space Station flies around inside the earth’s atmosphere, NOT SPACE and it is not floating in a zero G atmosphere! Where it flies is called “low earth orbit” which simply means the sky. Watch any airplane taking off from an airport. That airplane is flying in the same low earth orbit also, just not quite as high!

No Human Has Ever Left Earth’s Atmosphere, Here's Why

The Blue Origin "spacecraft" simply launched into the sky and fell back down just like any firework that is a rocket. When they begin to fall back down, it APPEARS that they are weightless when they are not! Man has never gone outside of the dome firmament that surrounds the earth and they never will.

Are Satellites Deployed by Balloon Instead of Being Launched into Space?

When I first read that satellites may be launched by balloons into the stratosphere instead of orbiting the earth in space, I thought it was a ridiculous theory. But, then I began to see video of our gov't launching satellites BY BALLOON!! Then I ran across the following video!

Project Loon - Improving Navigation (Video 2:1)

As you can see from the video above, Google has started Google Loon which will put Internet satellites in the stratosphere which will orbit the earth or even stay stationary to deliver Internet service!

Google: Loon Brand Video

This video shows how Google Loon is being used to take wifi to the world. If Google is able to do this, how long do you think the U.S. Gov't has been doing this with its satellites?

How Google Loon Works | HowStuffWorks

I met a man once who worked for the U.S. government. He did a lot of classified things that he couldn't talk about. He told me once that the U.S. gov't is always at least 50 years ahead in technology than what we know of! Just how long have they been sending satellites into the stratosphere and telling us they are in "geosynchronous orbit?"

This next video is very short and it shows a satellite being launched by balloon. This has been going on since the 1950's!

***Language Warning***


Now, if you REALLY want to know about satellites watch the following video. Here is proof that satellites have been launched by balloons! ***Language Warning***

ALL SATELLITES ARE ON BALLOONS & 50K ft. Altitude Flight Restriction (Video 2:3)

While it is a fact that many satellites are sent aloft via balloon, there is another piece of technology which tricks us and makes us think that there really are satellites in outer space. It is called "Tropospheric Scatter."

Several years ago, before high speed Internet, we used modems with a regular telephone line. Any time someone was on the Internet, the phone line would be tied up. I, like so many others, paid for a second phone line to our homes.

When high speed Internet service started coming out, I could not get it at my home. I was too far from the source. Finally, Sprint came out with what they called, "satellite" Internet access. It wasn't as fast as cable but it was faster than dial-up. An installer came to my house and put a diamond shaped antenna on my roof and it pointed to the mountains west of Salt Lake City. The installer told me I was barely within the limit of their service.

Even though we called it "satellite" it wasn't. It was a radio beam. I would imagine that is how our Directv and other devices that claim to be using satellite work.

The 2017 Solar Eclipse

On Monday, August 21, 2017 there was be a complete solar eclipse that spanned across the United States. While solar eclipses are not really rare, for them to happen in the same place is very rare and many decades will go by before a full solar eclipse happens again in the same place. There are people who literally fly across the earth to be able to see full solar eclipses.

Obviously, eclipses do happen. Astronomists tell us that the moon gets in between the sun and the earth. Astronomists can calculate when and where solar and lunar eclipses will occur very accurately. Below is a diagram showing how astronomists believe a solar eclipse occurs.

This diagram shows how most astronomists believe a solar eclipse happens. There is a problem with this though. The moon's shadow will be larger on the earth instead of smaller!

There is a problem with the explanation of a solar eclipse. If the moon gets in between the sun and the moon, we see the narrow track of the eclipse. The 2017 solar eclipse will enter the continental United States in Oregon and it will exit the continental United States from South Carolina.

There are several animations available online to help explain how this solar eclipse will happen. Several of those animations show the earth rotating in the opposite direction than what we have always been taught! The way an eclipse happens, it would make more sense IF the earth did rotate in the opposite direction. Seeing animations where the earth is rotating east to west instead of from west to east makes it much easier to show how the eclipse crosses the earth from west to east.

Obviously, we do have solar and lunar eclipses on the earth but I am not sure that astronomists have really understood what causes them. Look the diagram above again. Look at the small black shadow that is caused by the sun shining on the moon. There is a real problem with this.

I have been a photographer for four decades and because of that I understand light and how it behaves. Photography in its purest sense is light and composition. Let me explain what is wrong with that small shadow made from "the moon in between the sun and the earth."

The "Path of Totality" or the dark shadow that will cross this earth will be approximately 70 miles wide. That 70 mile wide swath will be the only place where viewers will be able to see a TOTAL solar eclipse. I live in Florida and what we will see here is just a partial solar eclipse. If the sun really is 93 million miles away from the earth and the moon is over 238,000 miles away from the earth, that shadow from the moon will be BIGGER than the moon, not smaller!

Do this simple experiment: In a dark room or outside at night when it is dark, hold a ping pong ball or a tennis ball against a wall or flat surface and shine the light on it. When the ball is right next to the object, it will appear almost the exact same size.

Now, back away from the wall or flat object and shine the light onto the ball and look at what happens to the shadow on the wall. The shadow gets "LARGER" not smaller! There is a real problem with the explanation for a solar eclipse. We take for granted everything we are taught throughout our lives. You must remember, science and theories change frequently!

Another problem about astronomists' explanation of eclipses is that there have been some where the sun and the moon were visible across the sky at the same time!

In a solar eclipse the sun shines on the moon and earth and the moon's shadow passes in between the sun and the earth. This causes the eclipse on the sun. In a lunar eclipse it is just opposite of that, we are told. The sun shines on the moon and earth again but the earth gets between the sun and the moon, causing a lunar eclipse.

Apparently astronomists have really not determined the exact causes of solar or lunar eclipses! Is there something else up there? Is there a round invisible object floating around that is really the cause of an eclipse?

The August 21st, 2017 Total Eclipse and the Flat Earth - Part I
(Video 2:4)

The August 21st, 2017 Total Eclipse and the Flat Earth - Part II
(Video 2:5)

(Video 2:6)

I have been a professional photographer for four decades. When I saw the drawing above that shows the "umbra" and "penumbra" I had to see if an object will make an umbra. It just didn't seem right to me and that the area of total coverage of the August 2017 was only 70 miles wide, especially when we are told the moon is only 2,159 miles in diameter. The moon is approximately one quarter the size of the earth and it is about 240,000 miles from the earth. We are told the sun is 93 million miles from the earth and is 109 times larger than earth.

I decided to run a test to see how a penumbra and umbra work. I used a studio flash with a 150 watt modeling lamp for my light source (sun) with a honeycomb grid to focus the light into a straighter beam.

For my experiment, I used a photo studio strobe with a 150 watt modeling lamp. I only used the modeling lamp and did not use the strobe.

In the first set of images, I placed my "moon" 29 inches away from my light source. I moved the white background away from moon to show how the shadows change. Bear in mind that this experiment is not to scale. To make it scale, with the moon that size, my light source would have to be all the way at the end of the block or further!

The moon is put almost touching the background. The shadow is almost exactly the size of the earth. As I move the background away from the moon, it is hard to see here but the shadow gets larger.
I move the background even further away from the moon. Notice the umbra and penumbra. It is hard to see here but the umbra is almost the same size as the moon.
And finally, with the moon even further away from the background. There is a less defined umbra.

In the third photo, the umbra and penumbra are easily visible. It is hard to see from the photograph that the umbra (the small inside shadow) is almost the same size as the "moon" because it is further away from the camera than the moon. In the August 2017 eclipse the total coverage path of the moon on the earth, which is the umbra, was only 70 miles wide. It could not be that narrow if the moon is truly 2,159 miles in diameter. This, in itself, proves that the moon is much closer than we have been told.

Another important note I made earlier on this site is that the "Tycho" crater on the moon is said to be 52 miles wide. Can we REALLY see a geological formation on the moon that is 52 miles wide, 240,000 miles away? There is absolutely no way this can be.

In the second part of my experiment, I moved my sun 55 inches away from the earth.

With the sun at 55 inches. With the background moved a little further from the earth.
There is less difference between the umbra and penumbra when the sun is further away from the earth.

We have been told that a moon's shadow in their solar eclipse model gets is much smaller than the actual moon. In fact, if we believe what we are told, the umbra is .032 as wide as the moon. This does not work in my experiment. Maybe the scientists expect us to believe this just work on a much larger scale even though it doesn't work on a smaller scale, just like how they want us to believe that the quadrillions of tons of the world's water sticks to the globe by gravity but yet a butterfly can easily break the bonds of gravity with a flap of their wings.

The Path of a Total Solar Eclipse ONLY works on the Flat Earth!

The GLOBE is DONE! After the August 21st Eclipse (A Flat Earth Discussion) (Video 2:7)

This is a very interesting video showing how the shadow of a total solar eclipse would move from East to West on a globe earth if the earth rotates around the sun and the moon rotates around the earth like we are told. In reality, a total solar eclipse only works on a flat earth! It still doesn't answer all of my questions about how a solar eclipse works on a flat earth and I am not convinced one hundred percent that the Gleason map is absolutely correct.

How Can Lunar Eclipses be Predicted on a Flat Earth?

If you haven't noticed by now, those who do not believe the earth is flat, usually get very angry at those who do believe the earth is flat. Globe earthers accuse flat earthers of being childish and being stupid and ignorant when, all the while, it is they who are actually "the pot calling the kettle black."

One of the frequent questions I see posited to flat earthers is, "How do lunar eclipses work on a flat earth model?" Globe earthers seem to think they have their "aha moment" when they ask this question but like the majority of their falsely inflated arguments, they do not take the time to research the truth.

Globe earthers believe that lunar eclipses can only work on a globe earth and they think they can prove this because lunar eclipses can be predicted from the past and for centuries to come. Well, here is the flat earther's "mic drop" moment! The Saros Cycle is how lunar eclipses are predicted into the future. The Saros Cycle was discovered by the Chaldeans CENTURIES BEFORE CHRIST when they KNEW the earth is flat! Remember, it was only around 500 years ago that some people thought they were smarter than all of the people before them and they started saying the earth was a globe. This is not something new that has been discovered since scientist changed the truth to the globe earth lie!

So, if you are a globe earther and you believe the prediction of lunar eclipses absolutely proves the earth is a globe, once again, you have it completely backwards and if anything, IN YOUR REASONING, the Saros Cycle proves the earth is flat!

Amazing Video Shows How Planets Rotate Around the Earth

Many people who are in opposition to the flat earth theory don't understand how the stars and planets work in the northern and southern hemispheres. This video does a great job of explaining how it all works in the flat earth model. The only thing I differ with is that I believe the earth is flat and round, not rectangular.

Shocking!!: Astronomers Release this Clip: The Heavens Revealed - This Will Blow Your Mind (Video 2:8)

A Word About Camera Lenses

When talking about camera lenses, it is more important to talk about "angle of view" than "focal length." Why is that? If we take a 35mm film camera which exposes a 36mm x 24mm piece of film or a "Full Frame" DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) camera which uses a 36mm x 24mm sensor, a 50mm lens is considered to be a "normal" or "standard" lens. The average human eye sees an angle of view of approximately 47 degrees so camera manufacturers, years ago, rounded that number off to 50mm. Years ago, before zoom lenses, photographers would commonly purchase a standard lens (50mm) with their camera. Then, as their funds allowed them to add lenses, they would add a wide angle lens (usually a 28mm wide angle lens with a 75 degree angle of view) and a telephoto lens (usually a 135mm lens with a 18 degree angle of view). Reference Nikon's Field of View Table

The problem with using focal lengths when trying to determine how much angle of view a lens will see is this, it changes with the size of film or camera sensor. While a 50mm lens is a normal or standard lens on a 35mm film camera or a full frame DSLR, on a medium format camera and a large format camera, it is a wide angle lens. The larger the film or camera sensor, the wider the lens will appear. A medium format Hassleblad camera that creates a 2 1/4 inch image on 120 and 220 size film uses an 80mm lens as a standard or normal lens. A 4 x 5 inch view camera which exposes a 4 inch x 5 inch sheet of film, uses a 150mm lens as a standard or normal lens. An 8 x 10 inch view camera uses a 325mm lens as a standard lens. For a 35mm or full frame DSLR, the standard lenses (the 80mm, the 150mm and the 325mm lenses) are all telephoto lenses! The 50mm lens, standard for the 35mm and full frame DSLR is a wide angle lens on any of those other cameras mentioned. So, you can see that it is better to talk about angle of view, which is the same regardless of film size, than to talk about focal length.

This diagram shows the angle of view for three different lenses in the 35mm film format and the full frame DSLR format. Focal lengths vary with the size of the film or camera sensor therefore, what is a standard lens for a 35mm film camera will not be the standard lens for a camera which uses different size film.

More on Camera Lenses

A standard lens for a 35mm camera has a 47 degree field of view. A standard 28mm wide angle lens has a field of view of 75 degrees. A short telephoto lens of 135mm has a field of view of 12 degrees (you can see that in the diagram above). For a digital camera, you'll have to adjust that for whatever size sensor you have in your camera but they will be very close.

I will draw all of this to EXACT SCALE in AutoCad to make it easy for everyone to understand.

Google says the earth has a diameter of 7,917.5 miles. The black circle represents the earth as a globe.

Using a "standard" lens for a 35mm camera (47 degree field of view - SEE BLACK & RED ANGLED LINES), the camera would have to be, AT LEAST 9,104.5 miles away from the earth BUT, as you can see, at this distance, because of the curvature of this imaginitive "globe" 47 degrees of your view of the globe, top and bottom will be obscured (look at the large black arrows). In this drawing, the black circle is the exact scale of what we are told is the diameter of the earth.

So, back up to just over 9,927 miles and even then, 23 degrees of your view will be obscured (look at the large red arrows). You would actually have to back up even more just to see around the edges of the globe but we will stop here.

The Karman Line is where most scientists agree that "space" starts. The Karman Line (represented by the very thin BLUE CIRCLE just visible outside of the black line that represents the earth) is 100km (62.1371mi). Let's see how high the space shuttles flew.

Here is a closeup to show you where we are told the space shuttles orbited and where we are told the ISS orbits.

",,,the Shuttles orbital altitude, which normally ranges from 190 miles to 330 miles (304 kilometers to 528 kilometers) above sea level, depending on its mission."
Kennedy Space Center FAQ (https://science.ksc.nasa.gov/pao/faq/faqanswers.htm)

The light green circles represent the altitude range in which the space shuttles orbited, according to Kennedy Space Center.

What about the International Space Station?

"The space station is made of parts that were assembled in space by astronauts. It orbits Earth at an average altitude of approximately 250 miles." What Is the International Space Station?

The magenta colored line represents the average altitude of the International Space Station (which, of course, falls within the average altitude of the space shuttles).

Looking at this diagram, you can see that it is absolutely impossible for anyone who was ever on a space shuttle or the ISS to photograph the entire earth from those platforms with a standard lens, or, as we will see, with a wide angle or fish eye lens!

What about a wide angle lens?

Look at just how far an “astronaut” would have to be from the earth to snap of photo of the entire “globe” with a 35mm camera with a 28mm wide angle lens. Remember that a 28mm lens has a 75 degree field of view.

If the photo was taken at over 6,500 miles, OVER 26 TIMES FURTHER AWAY THAN WHERE NASA SAYS THE ISS ORBITS, 37 degrees of the top and the bottom of the globe would still be out of view! The photographer would have to back up to OVER 7,000 MILES!!! This is over 29 times further away than the ISS is supposed to orbit the earth!

Any time you see a photo like the one below that is supposedly from the ISS and you think that you are actually seeing the curvature of the earth, they are using a “fish eye” lens that makes the horizon look curved. This photo would have had to have been taken probably 5,000 miles away from the earth and even NASA agrees that the ISS has never and will never go that far from the earth.

In fact, the horizon is FLAT but NASA makes it APPEAR to be curved by using fish eye lenses and the whole world has fallen for their B.S.

You will NEVER see a photo of the entire globe taken from the ISS (a real photo anyway - NASA is known to fake photos by using photo stitching and Photoshop manipulation). Why? Look at the field of view of fish eye lenses.

“A full-frame **fisheye lens** only captures a 180 degree **field of view** along its diagonal. The horizontal and vertical sides of the image **are** less than 180 degrees (typically around 150 degrees horizontal and 100 degrees vertical).”
Fisheye Lenses | Photography Mad (https://www.photographymad.com/pages/view/fisheye-lenses)

All NASA will ever legitimately be able to do from 250 miles above sea level is to make it APPEAR that the top, the left side, the right side or the bottom of the photograph will have a curved horizon, NEVER more than one at a time. It just isn’t possible.

Now, they can take hundreds and thousands of photographs of the earth, taken by satellites (which are held aloft by balloons) and they use a process called “photo stitching” to put them all together to make them appear to be one photograph. NASA does that repeatedly then they retouch the stitched photos to make them look they are real photos of a “globe” earth. They even admit it publicly!

Below, you will read more about the earth's FLAT horizon (not curved) and you will see the very first photograph ever taken from “space” (considered "space" since the photograph was taken above 100 kilometers or 62 miles which is above the Karman Line) and it shows what the earth’s horizon truly looks like when photographed with a normal lens that does not distort the view. This was taken before NASA began faking photographs and using fish eye lenses to deceive the whole world. (Look at the black & white photo in the next section).

Photos from Space ALWAYS Show a Flat Horizon UNLESS an Extreme Wide Angle or Fisheye Lens is Used!

Every photograph or video I have seen from the International Space Station is taken from a camera with an extreme wide angle fisheye lens. These lenses distort the view of the horizon and make the earth APPEAR to be curved. Take this photograph for example:

Most images we are shown from NASA are simply beautiful artwork. They are CGI or computer generated images. It is very hard to know which is real and which is cgi. IF this is a real photograph of the space shuttle from the ISS, they were using an extremely strong fisheye lens with an angle of view close to or equal to 180 degrees. The distortion from the lens makes the earth APPEAR to be curved when it is not. Also, notice how large the land masses appear to be. This is because of the distortion of the fish-eye lens.

It is extremely difficult to find any images that are supposedly taken from space that do not use extreme wide angle lenses and usually fisheye lenses. Fisheye lens, according to Wikipedia, begin at around 100 degree angle of view up to 180 degree angle of view. Not all fisheye lenses, especially those around 100 degree angle of view will completely distort the image into a circle like that of a lens with a 180 degree angle of view.

Without any doubt, this image is CGI. It is simply beautiful artwork that someone made on a computer. The ISS is supposed to fly around the earth at 17,150 mph! That is 4.76 miles per second! All of the lights on earth would be blurred and the stars in the sky would not be visible. The artist has also added the haze and a ring of light around the earth as well as adding curvature to the earth when there is none.

This is typical of the images that NASA provides that are supposedly from the ISS. Notice how the wide angle fisheye lens distorts not only the flat horizon, making the earth to APPEAR curved but it also distorts the solar panel that is on the top. It is very easy to see that a fisheye lens is used to make this image and that the curvature is an optical illusion. If there were an astronaut on the ISS, they would not see this image without looking through a camera with a fisheye lens!

Roll Your Mouse Over the Image

This is the very first image ever photographed from space. It was taken by a 35mm camera aboard a V2 rocket at the White Sands Missle Range on October 24, 1946, twelve years before NASA was founded on July 29, 1958. The camera fell from the rocket and was destroyed but the film survived. The camera used a normal lens and you can see that the horizon is completely flat even at the 65 mile altitude of the rocket. 65 miles is 343,200 feet or 104,607 meters!

Roll your mouse over the image and you will see a horizontal line showing the horizon is flat. Link

On a Globe Earth, How High Will North Korea's Hwasong 14 Missles Reach?

Recently, North Korea, under the direction of Kim Jong Un, has been launching intercontinental ballistic missles (ICBM). We also know that they have developed a nuclear weapon.

I was reading about their missles and when I read what the apogee (the highest altitude) of their ICBM is, I did a double-take!

The highest any of the Space Shuttles flew, according to NASA, was 385 miles! The average flight altitude for the Space Shuttles was 230 miles. But we are told that North Korea's Hwasong 14 rocket flew 2,300 miles high into the exosphere with temperatures as high as 1700 degrees Celcius or 3200 degrees Farenheit! Not only would the rocket be melted inside the exosphere but if what we have been told all of our life, the rocket would burn up on reentry to earth.

To get this altitude into my head enough to understand it, I utilized AutoCAD which is extremely powerful computer aided drafting software.

North Korea's Hwasong 14 ICBM is supposed to be able to reach an altitude of 1,800 miles and a range of 4,100 miles. In this drawing, you see the flight path of a Hwasong 14 ICBM. Also, the curved blue line is the average altitude of the Space Shuttles and the purple line represents the maximum altitude of any Space Shuttle. From the black line representing the earth to the red dotted line is the troposphore. From the dotted red line to the dotted green line is the stratosphere. Do we really believe that North Korea's ICBM goes five to six times higher than the ISS? How do they manage to miss all of the space debris and the ISS when a rocket goes this high? Someone is lying to us!

This is NASA's image of earth and all the space junk floating around it. If the International Space Station really orbits the earth and if the North Koreans ICBM goes as high into space as we are told, how does the ICBM keep from smashing into the ISS or other space junk? Also, how does the ISS dodge all of this stuff? You would have to be delusional!

This animated gif shows how ridiculous it is to think that anything could orbit the earth without coming into contact with some kind of space junk!

How can North Korea's missles fly into such an inhospitable part of our atmosphere then reenter earth's atmosphere without burning up? I will admit I am not a rocket scientist but I believe this is all ridiculous.

In this image, you see where the Space Shuttles flew and the different levels of the earth's atmosphere.The exosphere is not pictured. It is the last level of earth's atmosphere and lies beyond the thermosphere. The exosphere stretches from 440 miles to 6,200 miles above earth.


The large dotted, curved line shows the outer edge of the earth's exosphere. You can see by looking at the red line that North Korea's Hwasong 14 rocket flew into the exosphere.

What stops North Korea's ICBMs to just fly off into space? We are told that "space" starts somewhere around 100 kilometers. It is referred to as the Kármán line.

You can see that the ICBM goes much higher than the Space Shuttle ever flew. That is, if all of this globe earth and space stuff is true. If you believe the earth is a globe and if you believe NASA truly does send rockets into space, how do you explain this?

"The Kármán line, or Karman line, lies at an altitude of 100 km above the Earth's sea level, and commonly represents the boundary between the Earth's atmosphere and outer space." Wikipedia

We are told by globe earth scientists that outer space consists of a total vacuum and that things float in space. That means, in space, there is nothing. There are no air molecules. There is no sound in space because sound waves cannot travel through a vacuum.

We are being told that North Korea may be planning to shoot nuclear missles toward the US. Are we being lied to about that? If we are, why?

Which is Correct, the Globe Map or the Flat Earth Map?

I was converted to a Flat Earther over a period of time and in the last few months I have spent more time than I care to admit looking into the flat earth theory. Obviously, I used to believe, like most of you in the globe map but even if the earth was a ball, the map is extremely inaccurte! For example, Greenland appears to be big or bigger than South America when it isn't anywhere near that large.

I highly recommend you look at the following website: The True Size. You can move states or countries to different parts of the globe and see what the real size is. As you do this, you will see just how inaccurate the globe map is.

What about the flat earth map? I used to think it was right and answered many of the questions about the flat earth theory. Well, I found out that it is not accurate either. For example Australia appears to be much wider than it actually is. In order for the round disk of the earth to have the same surface area as the globe earth, it would have to be twice as big as what the flat earth model map shows. If this map is true, the sun would have to travel faster around the earth in the southern hemisphere than it does in the northern hemisphere.

I don't know what the earth truly looks like and no one else does either. We know that NASA creates all their images of the earth with computers. That is a proven fact and anyone with any common sense knows it. NASA even admits that the images of the earth are all computer generated! You can watch the video, where one of NASA's graphic artists admits that they HAVE to use Photoshop to create images of the earth, if you go to Page One of this website.

NASA keeps putting out images that they say are of the earth and they are all perfectly round. Then so many people have heard the earth is an oblate spheroid. This is the most popular trend now even though NASA's images and the oblate sheroid thought can't work together. Neil deGrasse Tyson says the earth looks more like a pear! So, who are we supposed to believe? Certainly not NASA, the people who hold to the oblate spheroid theory or Neil deGrasse Tyson. None of them has seen the earth nor have they see any legitimate images of the earth. On the same hand, the current flat earh map is not correct either. This does not disprove the flat earth model. We just need more information to be able to correctly determine the exact shape of the earth.

Did NASA really photograph the August 27, 2017 eclipse on earth from one million miles away?

From NASA's website:
NASA's EPIC View of 2017 Eclipse Across America

From a million miles out in space, NASA’s Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC) captured 12 natural color images of the moon’s shadow crossing over North America on Aug. 21, 2017. EPIC is aboard NOAA’s Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR), where it photographs the full sunlit side of Earth every day, giving it a unique view of total solar eclipses. EPIC normally takes about 20 to 22 images of Earth per day, so this animation appears to speed up the progression of the eclipse. There is a major problem with this video. The moon is shown to be traveling faster than the earth (watch the shadow) when, in fact, the moon travels approximately 27.3 times slower than the earth!(Video 2:9)

In my previous article on a video that was taken of the earth from a Maxus rocket, I prove that in order to photograph the entire earth with a standard or normal lens, the camera would have to be at a minimum of 9,104.5 miles from the earth. On this website, NASA claims to have taken photos of the earth from one million miles away during the eclipse of August 27, 2017.

Let's take a look at what kind of telephoto lens would have to be used to photograph the earth from one million miles away. To do this, I draw the earth as a globe as NASA says it is. All of NASA's images show a perfectly round earth even though the modern, popular thought is that the earth is an "oblate spheroid" which means it is fatter at the equater and not a perfect ball as NASA depicts in all of their computer generated images. Neil deGrasse Tyson says the earth "looks more like a pear."

I tried to draw the earth according to the size that we are told it is using extremely powerful AutoCad software. By drawing the earth to scale, 7,917.5 miles in diameter and a line from the surface of the earth one million miles long, it is almost impossible to see the earth at this scale. The angle of view of the telephoto lens that would be required to pull the earth into the camera's view ends up being less than 0 degrees. This is an incredibly POWERFUL telescope on this spaceship IF this is a true photograph of the earth.

I can almost guarantee what NASA presents to us on this website is CGI, a computer generated image. It is not a photograph or a series of photographs. It is simply art work made by a graphic artist!

Since I am unable to determine the angle of view of a camera photographing the earth from one million miles away by using AutoCad, we can calculate it with a little trigonometry. We come up with an angle of view of .2268 degrees! If we divide our eye's normal angle of view, 47 degrees by this, we get 207.23 times magnification! This means, if you are using a full frame DSLR camera or a 35mm camera, you would have to use a lens bigger than 10,000mm! That would also translate into a 408 inch telescope. Sorry, I just don't buy it. I believe NASA has struck again with their fake images of the earth!

What is the United States Government Capable of?

The Flat Earth theory has gained a lot of steam in the last couple of years. I have spent more time than I care to admit looking into the Flat Earth. If you go online and watch Flat Earth videos on YouTube, you will see a lot of videos that say crazy things about what our goverment is capable of. If you are like me, you will probably ignore the videos. I did ignore them until I saw someone who claimed that the U.S. was creating holograms. There were not ordinary holograms. They can be touched! Below, I show you the image that shows what the gov't is doing.

I talked with a man a few years ago. This man had been involved in a lot of top secret missions for the United States. He told me that the U.S. is always at least fifty years ahead of the technology that we see! What if the International Space Station is just a hologram? What else could be done with this hologram technology? I ask you to read the following.

1994: US Air Force Launches Top-Secret ‘Holographic Projector’ Research Program

The Airborne Holographic Projector [Source: Air University]According to a 1999 Washington Post website report, the US Air Force starts a research program this year to develop a “holographic projector” as a psychological warfare weapon. Holograms are three-dimensional images created by laser technology. The US military explored the idea of using holograms during the 1991 Gulf War to deceive the Iraqis, but did not pursue it for technical reasons. One idea was to project a hologram of Allah several hundred feet in size over Baghdad, but this would take a mirror in space more than a mile square, plus huge projectors and power sources. Additionally, there are strict Islamic proscriptions on the depiction of Allah. However, the US military did not abandon the concept. “The Gulf War hologram story might be dismissed were it not the case that [the Post] has learned that a super secret program was established in 1994 to pursue the very technology for PSYOPS [psychological operations] application. The “Holographic Projector” is described in a classified Air Force document as a system to “project information power from space… for special operations deception missions.” [WASHINGTON POST, 2/1/1999SYDNEY MORNING HERALD, 2/5/2000] A 1996 study commissioned by a US Air Force panel called “Air Force 2025” shows how a future “Airborne Holographic Projector” might look like. In this illustration, a virtual aircraft is created to deceive the enemy as to the size and location of attacking forces.

Imagine what could be done with these dimensional, tangible holograms. What else is the government doing that we are totally unaware of? They may even have technology that is completely out of the realm of physics. When people say that the International Space Station may just be a hologram, it could very well be.

I found an article online, "Scientists Create Holograms You Can Touch." It claims that scientists have already developed this technology and apparently are perfecting it. Remember what my friend told me, "Our government (United States) is always fifty years ahead of current technologies."

More Proof of NASA's Trickery

Take a look at these videos which were released by NASA.

NASA Bloopers, Blunders & Gaffs - Is Anyone Even in Space? (Video 2:10)

1965 NASA BUSTED - Stop Motion Animation Revealed (Video 2:11)

Space is a Near Total Vacuum? If That is True, What Would That Vacuum Do to a Space Suit or a Space Ship?

I spent 20 years working in oil refineries and several more years working in other parts of the oil industry. We had equipment that would pull vacuums but on earth, it is impossible to pull a total vacuum.

I ran across this video a few days ago on Facebook. It explains very well what would happen to the tires on Tesla's roadster that was launched into space on the Space X heavy rocket. Also, it makes you realize what would happen if we really did send a spaceship to space or put men in space in flimsy space suits.

This is one of the better videos I've found on Facebook that exposes the lies we have been told about NASA sending rockets to space. It could not be done without the vacuum of space ripping the spaceships and/or space suits to shreds.

Vacuum Facts Dismantle SpaceX_NASA Hoax from Brucie Baby on Vimeo.

Vacuum Facts Dismantle SpaceX/NASA Hoax (Video 2:12)

Pastor preaches a sermon using American and Russian documents that admit the earth is flat and not a globe!

This is an excellent video from Pastor Dean Odle in Alabama. He has done some incredible research into gov't documents which admit the earth is flat!

Gov't Documents Admit Flat Earth (Video 2:13)

The Moon is Only, around 70 miles wide!

The Moon is 70 Miles Wide - Proved (Video 2:14)

How NASA Fakes Everything

Pay attention to this guy's warning toward the end of the video. There WILL come a day where no one will be able to distinguish between what is real and what is fake!

How NASA Fakes Everything (Video 2:15)


If the Earth Really was a Globe, How Much Would All that Water in the Ocean Weigh?

Globe earthers can't decide if the earth is round like NASA's stitched photographic images show, if it is an "Oblate Spheroid" or if it is pear shaped like Neil deGrasse Tyson says. Let me encourage you to use some common sense, if a river or a stream flow downhill, how could so much more water "CLING" to the earth? It has to be that the earth is flat in order to hold the water of the oceans, lakes and ponds! To believe the earth is a round ball, oblate spheroid or whatever else you want to call it, takes a lot of faith because it goes against every thing we see and experience with our senses.

IF and that is a very big IF, the earth is round, just how much would all the water in the oceans weigh?

NOAA tells us (https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/oceandepth.html) that the average depth of the ocean is 2.3 miles or 12,100 feet! Not only would that water have to fight gravity, it would have to magically stick to the earth at all different kinds of angles.


No one can show any instance in the world of water not finding its own level and it certainly doesn't do so on the earth. This alone proves that the earth is flat.

To calculate how much all that water weighs, we can calculate the pounds per square inch of water. "Head pressure" is the weight of a column of a one square inch of water. One foot of water in a one inch square column weighs .433 pounds.

If we multiply 12,100 feet of water times .433, it equals 5,239.3 pounds per square inch! Is gravity really strong enough to keep that much water from sliding off of a ball earth?

Wikipedia says there 139.7 million square miles of ocean on the earth. If we calculate the weight of a square foot of water at the average depth of 12,100 feet, it comes out at an astonishing 754,459.2 pounds per square foot.

Now, are you ready for how much the water in the oceans weighs that this light force called "gravity" is supposed to be able to hold? And the answer is: 105,397,950,240,000 pounds! That is almost 105.5 TRILLION POUNDS of water!

Not only does the water not have to slide off of the earth at all those crazy angles, it also has to fight gravity which would try to sling it off of the earth if the earth was rotating!

Science tells us that all of that water and all of its weight clings to the earth at all different angles but a butterfly which weighs just a few grams can break the bonds of gravity as it flies! The earth is not a globe!

Is the Moon Simply a Reflection of the Flat Earth?

I ran across the following series of videos on Youtube recently. At first, they didn't make much sense to me but the more I look at them, I am beginning to see what they are conveying. Admiral Richard Byrd, in the 1950's reported that they had found more land masses past the South Pole of which the world is unaware. If these videos are true, they also reflect the earth as being flat in addiction to those additional land masses. Whoever put the videos together has names for those land masses.

Mapping Flat Earth on a Plasma Moon Part 1 (Video 2:16)

Mapping Flat Earth on a Plasma Moon Part 2 (Video 2:17)

Mapping Flat Earth on a Plasma Moon Part 3 (Craters) (Video 2:18)

NASA's Fake Images Just Keep Getting Better

In the 1960's before digital cameras, Photoshop and other computer programs that allow us to manipulate photos, NASA made models and did the best they could to fake photos of "space." As you'll see in this video NASA's trickery has gotten better and better. NASA admits that they use Photoshop to combine hundreds and thousands of photos to create an image of the earth as a globe. Personally, I believe movie director Stanley Kubrick helped NASA pull off the hoax of a moon landing in 1969. Watch the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey and see how our modern day images from NASA got their start.

100 Percent Proof We Can't Orbit Earth. Debunk This (Video 2:19)

Is the Mars Rover Really on Mars?

Jeran Campanella has run across some very important images that may prove that the Mars Rover is NOT on Mars but right here on planet earth.

Simulated Mars Environment on Devon Island - Curiosity Images are NASA Fakes. (Video 2:20)

Sonoluminescence, Proof of How Our Sun Works?

Scientists have been able to create a "star in a jar" using "sonoluminescence." By using sound waves to "excite" a bubble, a star is created! See the video below.

I'm amazed at how Jesus Christ created everything that there is and how scientists slowly discover more and more of what Christ did. Understanding sonoluminescence helps us realize how this earth was made. The Bible tells us that the earth is flat and that there is a dome (firmament) over the earth. The Lord created that firmament to divide "the waters from the waters."

Genesis 1:6-8 (KJV)
6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. 7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. 8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

The Old Testament of the Bible was originally written in Hebrew and Chaldee. The word that is translated into the English word "firmament" is tranliterated from the Hebrew as "rāqîaʿ." The Strongs Exhaustive concordance gives us this meaning of the word "rāqîaʿ:"
"from <H7554> (raqa`); properly an expanse, i.e. the firmament or (apparently) visible arch of the sky :- firmament." (Emphasis is mine.)

This comes from a root word in Hebrew (Strongs <H7554>) and this is what the Strongs Exhaustive concordance says about it:
"to pound the earth (as a sign of passion); by analogy to expand (by hammering); by implication to overlay (with thin sheets of metal) :- beat, make broad, spread abroad (forth, over, out, into plates), stamp, stretch."

Let's look at how the New Living Translation of the Bible gives us this passage of scripture.
Genesis 1:6-8 (NLT2)
6 Then God said, “Let there be a space between the waters, to separate the waters of the heavens from the waters of the earth.” 7 And that is what happened. God made this space to separate the waters of the earth from the waters of the heavens. 8 God called the space “sky.” And evening passed and morning came, marking the second day.

Now, let's look at how the Bible in Basic English.
Genesis 1:6-8 (BBE)
6 And God said, Let there be a solid arch stretching over the waters, parting the waters from the waters. 7 And God made the arch for a division between the waters which were under the arch and those which were over it: and it was so. 8 And God gave the arch the name of Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, the second day.

The Holman Concise Bible Commentary says this about the firmament (expanse, arch, dome) above the earth:
"The Hebrew word for expanse is from a root meaning "to spread out, stamp, beat firmly," which suggests something like a dome; Job 37:16-18; Isaiah 40:22."
Job 37:16-18 (ESV)
16 Do you know the balancings of the clouds, the wondrous works of him who is perfect in knowledge, 17 you whose garments are hot when the earth is still because of the south wind? 18 Can you, like him, spread out the skies, hard as a cast metal mirror?
Isaiah 40:22 (ESV)
22  It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in;

Sonoluminescence (Star in a Jar) (Video 2:21)

Flat earthers have proved that the sun is not 93 million miles from the earth and that it is not 864,340 miles in diameter. It is, in fact, much closer to the earth. Could it be that the earth's sun is just outside of the dome firmament that covers and protects the earth from waters in the heavens? I believe it absolutely could be. If it is just outside of the dome that is over the earth and sonoluminescence is what causes it to shine so brightly, what are the sound waves that are causing it to do what the "star in the jar" does? Could it be the Word of God?

To see proof that the earth is flat and is covered by a dome go back to Page 1 by Clicking Here.


NASA's First Film from "Outer Space"

Historic First Clear Look at the Stars from Space

Stanley Kubrick is the father of everything people think of when they think about how space is supposed to look. If you watch the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey, you will see how NASA still uses the same models and looks just as Kubrick did. I would bet NASA never intended for this film to still be available to the general public. NASA has always built a public illusion as to what "space" is supposed to look like. When this film was released in 1962, you can bet people believed it! It was just as ridiculous then as it is now!

Why is it Say the Right Things but Believe the Wrong Things?

In the flat earth community, we believe the earth is a fixed, stationary flat plane. We believe the sun rotates around the earth as does the moon. We do not believe the earth rotates around the sun nor do we believe the earth rotates on an axis. We also do not belived we live in a galaxy that is flying through the universe.

From the time we are young we are taught to say the right things, such as:



Even the Bible tells us these things. It tells us the earth is a flat, fixed circular plane and that the sun rises and sets, not the earth!

Why do we talk about SEA LEVEL if we believe the oceans on earth stick to a circular ball. We KNOW that water always finds its own level. That is why we are able to use WATER LEVELS!

The truth has always been completely evident to our eyes and to our senses but we are taught evil lies that twist and pervert truth!!!


Page 1        Page 2       Page 3     Books     Links     FAQ

More Coming All the Time - Stay Tuned and Check Back Often!


This website is in compliance with, "Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."

All rights reserved go to their respective holders. We do not own "ALL" the intellectual property shown on this website, the respective holders own that privilege unless stated otherwise.

We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website. We do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accurace or reliability of any content or communications posted on this website.